Autor: Administrador

...continúa el post. Visistar las páginas 105-109 de la obra La Verdadera Historia del Club Bilderberg de Daniel Estulin.

Debido a la imposibilidad por parte del gestor de blogs de realizar un solo post con el tema que nos ocupa hemos tenido que fraccionarlo en tres partes para poder dar cabida a este lamentable hecho.

Veremos a continuación como en realidad Estulin no confirma nada sino que COPIA la información de un texto presente en la web llamado:Gun Control and the New World Order y del cual no cita en ningún lugar su procedencia dando a entender que es autoría suya. Obsérvese en color azul el texto "fusilado" y entre corchetes y cursivas los agregados de este singular escritor.

Gun Control and the New World Order

This law is taught and explained in the National War College, and the various U.S. Armed Forces Academies. The New World Order [El Nuevo Orden Internacional] will require an Army: this is it, and presumably [nosotros, la gente del mundo] the U.S. itself [and Canada!] could then find itself policed by foreign troops under the U.N. flag [que adicionalmente tendrán el derecho de detenernos si no cumplimos con las normas del Nuevo Orden Mundial]. By agreement, the commander of this army must always be a Russian! [See below for documentation on this astonishing fact]

The relevant pages and sections are: [John Whitley, director de New World Order Intelligence Update, que ahora se ve obligado a ocultar su paradero me ha dirigido la atención a las páginas y secciones más relevantes] page 554; page 555 (lower right-hand side of page: defines "disarmament" as elimination of U.S. Forces and calls for absolute restrictions on privately-owned "deadly weapons"); page 557, sections (a) and (d) (again, require U.S. to eliminate its Armed Forces); page 558 deals with "policy formulation" (i.e. the accomplishment of these goals). George Bush said that the passing of authority to the Secretary-General was "in transition"; the Supreme Court has already ruled that the U.S. Constitution and its provisions stand UNDER the U.N. Charter and the Resolutions of the United Nations. The U.S. Armed Forces are acting as the U.N.'s "world policeman" in the interim.

The provisions of this law are further explained in STATE DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION 72-77, which itself is published in unabridged form in the 35-page "BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE", published by U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY [PUBLICATION #4, GENERAL SERIES #3, MAY 1962],. I'm sure you find this hard to believe, but it's all there in black and white; read it for yourself! The implications are staggering but the multiple military base closings around the U.S take on a new perspective when you see the agenda which that law commits the U.S. government to follow! Another small tip is that new issues of uniforms [e.g. the new Air Force uniform] reportedly have no "U.S." insignia. Canadian politicians are operating in lockstep with their U.S. counterparts on all of these issues, including gun control [UPDATE: 1995 law now requires all 7 million rifles, etc., in Canada to be registered by 2003 [2004] - failure to comply will be a serious criminal offense. Many Canadians [y estadounidenses] rightly see this as the prelude to later wholesale gun confiscation)

Please do go and read these documents for yourself. It's astonishing, but it's exactly as I've described it to you. The North American Free Trade Agreement is a small but vital part of something much bigger - first Continental Union then World Federalism!

[John Whitley me ha advertido que] Don't be misled by the wording of "Policy Formulation" on page 558 in volume 9, U.S. CODE, 1982. [Según Whitley y varias fuentes independientes dentro de la CIA] It was re-written in 1963 to pacify objectors, and forbids removal of firearms from the populace or reduction in national armed strength "unless it is pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President or authorised by legislation of the Congress"! The U.N Charter is regarded as an already-binding treaty, so all that is required is a U.N. Resolution or Congressional legislation to ban all "citizen" armaments. George Bush's father, Preston, helped push this law (87-297) through Congress. One of the experts on it is ex-State Senator Bernadine Smith (Box 1776, HANFORD, CALIFORNIA 93232), who resisted it bitterly, and knows its contents and intent as well as anybody. Or you could just call the National War College and ask innocently for more information on it!

Two interesting footnotes on PUBLIC LAW 87-297 (1961):

•200 members of the Trilateral Commission had a late-March, 1993, meeting over several days in Washington, at which they discussed and agreed on the need for (guess what?) a New World Army and for U.N. sovereign control of individual states' immigration policies and decisions. On the evening of the 28th of March, their representatives dined with key U.S. government officials and presented these "recommendations", and then did the same thing over breakfast the next morning with Clinton. So here it comes! This will lead ultimately to an enormous concentration of power in very few hands.

•the BATF, as the "compliance and enforcement" arm of the Treasury Department (which has a CFR man heading it), has been unlawfully "compelling" gunshop owners across the U.S. to provide the names, addresses and zip codes of all "long gun" (rifle and shotgun) purchasers, when no legal requirement exists for this. They are apparently creating a computerised registry of ALL private weapons across the United States, by locality, street and house. Remember the confiscation rquirement for all weapons embodied in "A BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE" and in STATE DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION # 72-77?

This law is still in the current edition of the U.S. Code, although the page numbers have been changed. You can find it fairly easily by checking the index to the U.S. Code.